12% pricier ≈ $1,750
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 130 W vs 140 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 16.9 TFLOPS vs 17.5 TFLOPS
- pan.tf
- Gaming laptops
- HP Omen 16 RTX 3070 (2022)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to HP Omen 16 RTX 3070 (2022)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Omen 16 RTX 3070 (2022) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Omen 16 RTX 3070 (2022)
21% pricier ≈ $1,900
- Brightness 600 nits vs 250 nits
- Battery capacity 88 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 5,120
18% pricier ≈ $1,850
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU shader cores 3,072 vs 5,120
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 17.5 TFLOPS
4% pricier ≈ $1,600
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- MUX switch
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,396 vs 10,809
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 140 W
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 70 Wh
14% pricier ≈ $1,800
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Video memory 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Weight 2.9 kg vs 2.3 kg
- Thickness 28 mm vs 23 mm
Same price ≈ $1,600
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 16 GB
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- GPU shader cores 3,072 vs 5,120
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 2.3 kg
11% pricier ≈ $1,750
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Brightness 300 nits vs 250 nits
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- SSD (base) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
34% pricier ≈ $2,100
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,489 vs 10,809
4% pricier ≈ $1,600
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 140 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 11.7 TFLOPS vs 17.5 TFLOPS
4% pricier ≈ $1,600
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 100 W vs 140 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 11.7 TFLOPS vs 17.5 TFLOPS