6% pricier ≈ $4,100
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Thickness 27 mm vs 30 mm
- Cooling fans 3 vs 2
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS
- Video memory 16 GB vs 24 GB
Alternatives to Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $3,900
9.5
Alternatives to the Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
Same price ≈ $3,900
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 25,565 vs 29,020
3
Medion · 2025Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
Same price ≈ $3,800
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Video memory 16 GB vs 24 GB
7% pricier ≈ $4,100
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 29,638 vs 29,020
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- Thickness 28 mm vs 30 mm
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 99 Wh
12% pricier ≈ $4,300
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Ethernet 5 Gbit/s vs 1 Gbit/s
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 31,120 vs 29,020
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
9% pricier ≈ $4,200
- Ethernet 5 Gbit/s vs 1 Gbit/s
- Max. supported RAM 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Thickness 26 mm vs 30 mm
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
19% pricier ≈ $4,600
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 31,227 vs 29,020
- Thickness 27 mm vs 30 mm
- Weight 2.72 kg vs 2.5 kg
- SSD (base) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
6% pricier ≈ $4,100
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Ethernet 5 Gbit/s vs 1 Gbit/s
- Cooling fans 3 vs 2
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
13% cheaper ≈ $3,400
- Thickness 27 mm vs 30 mm
- Cooling fans 3 vs 2
- USB-A ports 3 vs 2
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
12% pricier ≈ $4,400
- Ethernet 5 Gbit/s vs 1 Gbit/s
- Thickness 23 mm vs 30 mm
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- Video memory 8 GB vs 24 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 16,879 vs 29,020