≈ $6,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 10,065
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 99 Wh
Alternatives to Gigabyte Aorus 15 RTX 4060 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Aorus 15 RTX 4060 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Aorus 15 RTX 4060 (2023)
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,334 vs 588
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 14,930 vs 9,324
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Thickness 23.4 mm vs 20.8 mm
- USB-A ports 2 vs 3
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,334 vs 588
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 14,930 vs 9,324
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Thickness 23.4 mm vs 20.8 mm
- USB-A ports 2 vs 3
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,321 vs 588
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 14,577 vs 9,324
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.39 kg
- Thickness 27.8 mm vs 20.8 mm
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,321 vs 588
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 14,577 vs 9,324
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.39 kg
- Thickness 27.8 mm vs 20.8 mm
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 12,596 vs 9,324
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,528 vs 10,065
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 99 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,670 vs 10,065
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- Thickness 23.4 mm vs 20.8 mm
- USB-A ports 2 vs 3
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 18,694 vs 9,324
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,504 vs 588
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,149 vs 10,065
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 99 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,423 vs 10,065
- GPU shader cores 9,728 vs 3,072
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.39 kg
- Thickness 27.8 mm vs 20.8 mm
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,305 vs 10,065
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.39 kg
- Thickness 27.8 mm vs 20.8 mm