4% cheaper ≈ $1,650
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 76 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Dolby Atmos
Alternatives to Gigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5060 (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Aero X16 RTX 5060 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Aero X16 RTX 5060 (2025)
6% pricier ≈ $1,850
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 14.7 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,184 vs 10,480
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- Weight 2.81 kg vs 1.9 kg
6% cheaper ≈ $1,600
- RAM (up to) 128 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 20.1 TFLOPS vs 14.7 TFLOPS
21% pricier ≈ $2,100
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 1.9 kg
Same price ≈ $1,650
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 85 W
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Max. supported RAM 16 GB vs 64 GB
5% pricier ≈ $1,800
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 85 W
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 76 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,869 vs 10,480
25% pricier ≈ $2,150
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight 1.63 kg vs 1.9 kg
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
10% cheaper ≈ $1,550
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 14.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,087 vs 10,480
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- Weight 2.81 kg vs 1.9 kg
13% cheaper ≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 20.1 TFLOPS vs 14.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,426 vs 10,480
- Refresh rate 180 Hz vs 165 Hz
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB
24% pricier ≈ $2,150
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 400 nits
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 2,000 GB