Same price ≈ $1,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 13 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,689 vs 10,495
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Alternatives to Gigabyte Gaming A18 RTX 5070 (2025)
10 desktop replacements at a similar price that compete with the Gaming A18 RTX 5070 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Gaming A18 RTX 5070 (2025)
13% pricier ≈ $1,850
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 13 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,543 vs 10,495
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Response time 8 ms vs 3 ms
14% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 13 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,695 vs 10,495
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
23% pricier ≈ $2,000
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thickness 23 mm vs 25 mm
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 96 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,000 GB
52% pricier ≈ $2,450
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 13 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,023 vs 10,495
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Response time 8 ms vs 3 ms
14% pricier ≈ $1,850
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 13 TFLOPS
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 96 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,000 GB
40% pricier ≈ $2,250
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thickness 23 mm vs 25 mm
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 96 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,000 GB
6% pricier ≈ $1,700
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 96 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,000 GB
7% pricier ≈ $1,750
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 96 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,000 GB
23% cheaper ≈ $1,250
- Max CPU clock 5.1 GHz vs 4.9 GHz
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 96 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,000 GB