Same price ≈ $3,200
- CPU cores 24 vs 10
- Battery capacity 96 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,404 vs 21,412
Alternatives to Gigabyte A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the A16 Pro RTX 5080 (2025)
7% cheaper ≈ $2,900
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- CPU cores 20 vs 10
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 2.68 kg vs 2.3 kg
7% pricier ≈ $3,400
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 76 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 2.72 kg vs 2.3 kg
16% pricier ≈ $3,600
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- CPU cores 20 vs 10
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
5
Medion · 2025Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Same price ≈ $3,100
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 76 Wh
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Video memory 12 GB vs 16 GB
Same price ≈ $3,100
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Weight 1.9 kg vs 2.3 kg
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
9% cheaper ≈ $2,900
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 165 Hz
- CPU cores 24 vs 10
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 76 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
17% cheaper ≈ $2,600
- CPU cores 24 vs 10
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 2.52 kg vs 2.3 kg
8% cheaper ≈ $2,900
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 76 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.3 kg
18% cheaper ≈ $2,600
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- CPU cores 20 vs 10
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 2.68 kg vs 2.3 kg