≈ $2,800
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (base) 2,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Alternatives to Asus TUF Gaming F15 RTX 3050 (2022)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the TUF Gaming F15 RTX 3050 (2022) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the TUF Gaming F15 RTX 3050 (2022)
≈ $2,600
- Video memory 32 GB vs 4 GB
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 2,048
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- CPU cores 8 vs 12
≈ $1,750
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,534 vs 4,909
- GPU compute (FP32) 16.9 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- Video memory 16 GB vs 4 GB
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- MUX switch
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 6,018 vs 4,909
- GPU power (TGP) 90 W vs 95 W
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 90 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.5 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,897 vs 4,909
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.49 kg vs 2.2 kg
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Brightness 500 nits vs 350 nits
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.49 kg vs 2.2 kg
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,024 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,557 vs 4,909
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- MUX switch
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,270 vs 4,909
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- CPU cores 6 vs 12
≈ $2,150
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,080 vs 4,909
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- Video memory 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $3,700
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,065 vs 4,909
- GPU power (TGP) 145 W vs 95 W
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 90 Wh