Same price ≈ $1,700
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- Thickness 21.5 mm vs 26 mm
- MUX switch
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
Alternatives to Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)
18% pricier ≈ $2,050
- CPU cores 14 vs 8
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- Thickness 21.5 mm vs 26 mm
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,047 vs 14,947
10% pricier ≈ $1,900
- Video memory 32 GB vs 8 GB
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.6 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.2 kg
24% pricier ≈ $2,150
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.2 kg
- Dolby Atmos
13% cheaper ≈ $1,500
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,743 vs 931
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
17% pricier ≈ $2,050
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,277 vs 14,947
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.2 kg
12% cheaper ≈ $1,550
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,792 vs 14,947
Same price ≈ $1,750
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
36% pricier ≈ $2,350
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 165 Hz
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 4,608
- Bluetooth 5 vs 5.3
24% pricier ≈ $2,150
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 2.2 kg