12% pricier ≈ $1,700
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- Thickness 21.5 mm vs 26 mm
- MUX switch
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
Alternatives to Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)
Same price ≈ $1,500
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
14% pricier ≈ $1,750
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,947 vs 12,792
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,328
5% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- GPU compute (FP32) 22.1 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,045 vs 12,792
- Refresh rate 180 Hz vs 165 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 95 W vs 115 W
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 90 Wh
34% pricier ≈ $2,050
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- CPU cores 14 vs 8
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Dolby Atmos
9% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,328
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.71 kg vs 2.2 kg
Same price ≈ $1,500
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 75 Wh vs 90 Wh
13% cheaper ≈ $1,350
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Same price ≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,862 vs 12,792
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,328
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
5% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 75 Wh vs 90 Wh