≈ $2,800
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (base) 2,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.29 kg vs 2.2 kg
Alternatives to Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 3050 (2022)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 3050 (2022) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 3050 (2022)
≈ $2,600
- Video memory 32 GB vs 4 GB
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 2,048
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 2.2 kg
- Thickness 26 mm vs 24.9 mm
≈ $1,750
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,534 vs 5,238
- GPU compute (FP32) 16.9 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- Video memory 16 GB vs 4 GB
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- MUX switch
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU power (TGP) 90 W vs 95 W
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 90 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.49 kg vs 2.2 kg
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.49 kg vs 2.2 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,270 vs 5,238
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- MUX switch
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,024 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,557 vs 5,238
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 90 Wh
- MUX switch
≈ $2,150
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,080 vs 5,238
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- Video memory 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.25 kg vs 2.2 kg
≈ $3,700
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,065 vs 5,238
- GPU power (TGP) 145 W vs 95 W
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.36 kg vs 2.2 kg