Same price ≈ $1,200
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 12.2 TFLOPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 63 Wh
- Response time 9 ms vs 3 ms
Alternatives to Asus TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)
Same price ≈ $1,200
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 63 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.9 TFLOPS vs 12.2 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.42 kg vs 2.2 kg
- Response time 6 ms vs 3 ms
Same price ≈ $1,200
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 12.2 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Weight 2.42 kg vs 2.2 kg
- Response time 6 ms vs 3 ms
5% pricier ≈ $1,250
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,213 vs 10,251
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 12.2 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.48 kg vs 2.2 kg
- Dolby Atmos
20% cheaper ≈ $970
- Brightness 400 nits vs 300 nits
- Thickness 24 mm vs 27 mm
- Battery capacity 61 Wh vs 63 Wh
- Video memory 6 GB vs 8 GB
16% cheaper ≈ $1,000
- Weight 1.98 kg vs 2.2 kg
- Thickness 23 mm vs 27 mm
- Max. supported RAM 96 GB vs 64 GB
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 63 Wh
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 165 Hz
34% pricier ≈ $1,600
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 63 Wh
- CPU cores 8 vs 10
25% pricier ≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 12.2 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Weight 2.48 kg vs 2.2 kg
- Dolby Atmos
17% pricier ≈ $1,400
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.2 kg
- SSD (base) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Battery capacity 57 Wh vs 63 Wh
- Max. supported RAM 16 GB vs 64 GB
45% pricier ≈ $1,750
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 12.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,978 vs 9,662
- Weight 2.42 kg vs 2.2 kg
- Response time 6 ms vs 3 ms