- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,009 vs 754
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 150 W
- Battery capacity 95 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,722 vs 24,294
- Response time 9 ms vs 3 ms
Alternatives to Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,009 vs 754
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 150 W
- Battery capacity 95 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Response time 9 ms vs 3 ms
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 2.3 kg
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,009 vs 754
- Battery capacity 95 Wh vs 90 Wh
- CPU cores 24 vs 14
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 39.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,981 vs 24,294
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,809 vs 754
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 500 nits
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.3 kg
- IR camera (face login)
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,145 vs 754
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,145 vs 754
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 150 W
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,337 vs 754
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.3 kg
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 14,504 vs 15,617
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 150 W
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,337 vs 754
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.3 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,848 vs 24,294
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,071 vs 754
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.3 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,105 vs 24,294
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,071 vs 754
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,629 vs 24,294
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.3 kg