≈ $4,300
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 120 W
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 31 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.14 kg vs 1.95 kg
- SSD (up to) 3,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
Alternatives to Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5080 (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5080 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5080 (2025)
≈ $5,600
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 120 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 31 TFLOPS
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Weight 2.14 kg vs 1.95 kg
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 120 W
- USB-A ports 3 vs 2
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 13,856 vs 16,071
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 125 W vs 120 W
- USB-A ports 3 vs 2
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
≈ $6,400
- Resolution class 4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.9 TFLOPS vs 31 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,718 vs 21,144
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 35.4 TFLOPS vs 31 TFLOPS
- Video memory 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 4,096 GB
- USB-A ports 3 vs 2
- Fan noise (max. load) 53.4 dB vs 68 dB
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 31 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,623 vs 21,144
≈ $4,600
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 90 Wh
- RAM (base) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,710 vs 21,144
≈ $2,450
- CPU cores 24 vs 16
- Advanced Optimus
- Upgradable RAM
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 1.87 kg vs 1.95 kg
- Advanced Optimus
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,674 vs 21,144
- CPU cores 8 vs 16