Same price ≈ $3,200
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 73 Wh
- Advanced Optimus
- M.2 SSD slots 2 vs 1
- GPU compute (FP32) 16.6 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 100 W vs 115 W
Alternatives to Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 (2026)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $3,200
8.6
Alternatives to the ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 (2026)
12% pricier ≈ $3,600
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 73 Wh
- Video memory 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 1.88 kg vs 1.58 kg
13% pricier ≈ $3,600
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Battery capacity 84 Wh vs 73 Wh
- Advanced Optimus
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 1.8 kg vs 1.58 kg
15% pricier ≈ $3,700
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 500 nits
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 73 Wh
- M.2 SSD slots 2 vs 1
- GPU power (TGP) 90 W vs 115 W
- MUX switch
7% pricier ≈ $3,400
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 73 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.58 kg
11% pricier ≈ $3,500
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 73 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.58 kg
10% cheaper ≈ $2,900
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 73 Wh
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,272 vs 13,404
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Same price ≈ $3,200
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 500 nits
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 73 Wh
- M.2 SSD slots 2 vs 1
- GPU compute (FP32) 15.3 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 90 W vs 115 W
30% pricier ≈ $4,200
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,645 vs 13,404
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 73 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 1.99 kg vs 1.58 kg
5% cheaper ≈ $3,000
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Thickness 10 mm vs 18 mm
- SSD (base) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7
- Bluetooth 5.3 vs 6