- Battery capacity 95 Wh vs 90 Wh
- SSD (base) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Vapor chamber cooling
- Brightness 500 nits vs 1,100 nits
- Panel type IPS vs Mini-LED
Alternatives to Asus ROG Strix SCAR 16 RTX 4080 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the ROG Strix SCAR 16 RTX 4080 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ROG Strix SCAR 16 RTX 4080 (2023)
- Battery capacity 95 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 37.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,277 vs 20,629
- Brightness 500 nits vs 1,100 nits
- Panel type IPS vs Mini-LED
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 37.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,735 vs 20,629
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.5 kg
- Dolby Atmos
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,815 vs 20,629
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 25,737 vs 20,629
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 25,145 vs 20,629
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 37.6 TFLOPS
- Brightness 500 nits vs 1,100 nits
- Panel type IPS vs Mini-LED
≈ $6,800
- RAM (base) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (base) 2,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 2.5 kg
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 754 vs 2,071
- Brightness 500 nits vs 1,100 nits
- Battery capacity 95 Wh vs 90 Wh
- SSD (base) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Vapor chamber cooling
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 37.6 TFLOPS
- Brightness 500 nits vs 1,100 nits
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Vapor chamber cooling
- USB-A ports 4 vs 2
- Brightness 500 nits vs 1,100 nits
- Panel type IPS vs Mini-LED
≈ $4,100
- Panel type OLED vs Mini-LED
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,935 vs 20,629
- Brightness 500 nits vs 1,100 nits
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB