Same price ≈ $2,150
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,382 vs 9,046
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
Alternatives to Asus ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $2,200
6.1
Alternatives to the ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4050 (2023)
Same price ≈ $2,100
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,240 vs 9,046
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
Same price ≈ $2,150
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
Same price ≈ $2,150
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,196 vs 9,046
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
6% cheaper ≈ $2,050
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 15.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,444 vs 9,046
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 135 W vs 140 W
4% pricier ≈ $2,250
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,599 vs 9,046
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
25% pricier ≈ $2,700
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,929 vs 9,046
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Brightness 400 nits vs 300 nits
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
7% cheaper ≈ $2,050
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,277 vs 9,046
- GPU shader cores 5,888 vs 2,560
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
- Video memory 12 GB vs 16 GB
Same price ≈ $2,150
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Video memory 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,080 vs 9,046
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 240 Hz
16% pricier ≈ $2,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,045 vs 9,046
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB