13% cheaper ≈ $5,600
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 120 W
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 400 nits
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Weight 2.14 kg vs 1.85 kg
Alternatives to Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $6,400
9.6
Alternatives to the ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)
28% cheaper ≈ $4,600
- MUX switch
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 90 Wh
- CPU cores 16 vs 12
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,710 vs 24,718
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 10,496
17% cheaper ≈ $5,300
- MUX switch
- Weight 1.58 kg vs 1.85 kg
- CPU cores 16 vs 12
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
22% cheaper ≈ $5,000
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- MUX switch
- CPU cores 16 vs 12
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
33% cheaper ≈ $4,300
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 120 W
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 400 nits
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Weight 2.14 kg vs 1.85 kg
28% cheaper ≈ $4,600
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 31 TFLOPS vs 37.9 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,000 GB
- MUX switch
- Video memory 12 GB vs 24 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
27% cheaper ≈ $4,700
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 400 nits
- GPU power (TGP) 160 W vs 120 W
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB
- MUX switch
- Weight 1.63 kg vs 1.85 kg
- Video memory 8 GB vs 24 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,306 vs 24,718
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,000 GB
- MUX switch
- Video memory 8 GB vs 24 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,846 vs 24,718