≈ $4,600
- MUX switch
- GPU compute (FP32) 23.2 TFLOPS vs 17.2 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 90 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 100 W vs 105 W
Alternatives to Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5060 (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5060 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5060 (2025)
≈ $6,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.9 TFLOPS vs 17.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,718 vs 12,978
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Brightness 400 nits vs 500 nits
- MUX switch
- GPU compute (FP32) 23.2 TFLOPS vs 17.2 TFLOPS
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Battery capacity 84 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 100 W vs 105 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 17.2 TFLOPS
- MUX switch
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 105 W
- Battery capacity 72 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 13,980 vs 14,591
≈ $4,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 31 TFLOPS vs 17.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,328
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,359 vs 12,978
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- MUX switch
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 105 W
- Weight 1.63 kg vs 1.85 kg
- Battery capacity 72 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,102 vs 12,978
- GPU compute (FP32) 35.4 TFLOPS vs 17.2 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,363 vs 12,978
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 28.2 TFLOPS vs 17.2 TFLOPS
- MUX switch
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 1.85 kg
- MUX switch
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 15,346 vs 14,591
- Battery capacity 84 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 100 W vs 105 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 17.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 1.85 kg