≈ $5,000
- GPU compute (FP32) 23.2 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 500 nits
- MUX switch
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 84 Wh vs 90 Wh
Alternatives to Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 4060 (2024)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 4060 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 4060 (2024)
≈ $2,450
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 19,783 vs 10,886
- CPU cores 24 vs 10
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
≈ $4,700
- GPU compute (FP32) 23.2 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- MUX switch
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,710 vs 10,886
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 100 W vs 105 W
≈ $5,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.9 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,718 vs 10,886
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Brightness 400 nits vs 500 nits
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,183 vs 10,886
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,072
- MUX switch
- GPU compute (FP32) 16.6 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Battery capacity 84 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 100 W vs 105 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- MUX switch
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 27.2 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- MUX switch
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 19,786 vs 10,886
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel type IPS vs OLED