- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,135 vs 23,568
Alternatives to Alienware X16 RTX 4090 (2023)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the X16 RTX 4090 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the X16 RTX 4090 (2023)
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness 550 nits vs 300 nits
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 13,420 vs 12,672
- Weight 2.66 kg vs 2.72 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,792 vs 23,568
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 25,180 vs 23,568
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 13,420 vs 12,672
- Advanced Optimus
- HDR
- CPU cores 20 vs 10
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.2 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
≈ $5,000
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 2.72 kg
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 120 W vs 175 W
≈ $3,900
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 2.72 kg
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 3 ms
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 175 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 2.72 kg
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 175 W
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 2.72 kg
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 175 W
≈ $3,900
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 175 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz