≈ $3,900
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.72 kg
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
Alternatives to Alienware X16 RTX 4070 (2023)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the X16 RTX 4070 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the X16 RTX 4070 (2023)
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,568 vs 13,183
- GPU shader cores 9,728 vs 4,608
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 140 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,135 vs 13,183
- Battery capacity 97 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.09 kg vs 2.72 kg
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 130 W vs 140 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 19,370 vs 13,183
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 480 Hz
- MUX switch
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness 550 nits vs 300 nits
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 480 Hz
- MUX switch
≈ $3,600
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Weight 2 kg vs 2.72 kg
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Weight 2.01 kg vs 2.72 kg
- SSD (base) 1,024 GB vs 256 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 140 W
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $3,300
- CPU cores 16 vs 10
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 13,420 vs 12,672
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,898 vs 13,183
- Advanced Optimus
- HDR
≈ $3,000
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,860 vs 841
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 19,015 vs 12,672
- CPU cores 20 vs 10
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB