≈ $3,900
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,860 vs 8,093
- GPU compute (FP32) 20 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
Alternatives to Alienware X16 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the X16 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the X16 RTX 4050 (2023)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,682 vs 8,093
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Video memory 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,183 vs 8,093
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,568 vs 8,093
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,135 vs 8,093
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,560
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Weight 2 kg vs 2.72 kg
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,920 vs 8,093
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,037 vs 8,093
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.2 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 130 W vs 140 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,840 vs 8,093
- Battery capacity 97 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.09 kg vs 2.72 kg
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 130 W vs 140 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,709 vs 8,093
- Weight 1.78 kg vs 2.72 kg
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB