- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,522 vs 9,537
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.6 TFLOPS vs 12.1 TFLOPS
- Video memory 8 GB vs 6 GB
Alternatives to Alienware m18 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 desktop replacements at a similar price that compete with the m18 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the m18 RTX 4050 (2023)
- GPU compute (FP32) 20 TFLOPS vs 12.1 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,431 vs 9,537
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 12.1 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,790 vs 9,537
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 12.1 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,638 vs 9,537
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Weight 2.75 kg vs 4.23 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- Battery capacity 82 Wh vs 97 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 12.1 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.75 kg vs 4.23 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- Battery capacity 82 Wh vs 97 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 12.1 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,398 vs 9,537
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $3,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 12.1 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,961 vs 9,537
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 12.1 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,552 vs 9,537
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- Battery capacity 82 Wh vs 97 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 12.1 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,862 vs 9,537
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- Battery capacity 82 Wh vs 97 Wh