≈ $4,900
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,387 vs 10,996
- GPU shader cores 9,728 vs 3,072
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
Alternatives to Alienware m18 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)
10 desktop replacements at a similar price that compete with the m18 R2 RTX 4060 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the m18 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)
≈ $5,200
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 30,125 vs 10,996
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $3,300
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,338 vs 10,996
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,072
≈ $6,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,314 vs 10,996
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,072
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $4,300
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 27,302 vs 10,996
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,072
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $5,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 27,180 vs 10,996
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,072
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $4,000
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,128 vs 10,996
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,520 vs 10,996
- GPU shader cores 9,728 vs 3,072
≈ $7,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 30,865 vs 10,996
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 22,386 vs 10,996
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 300 nits
- Refresh rate 250 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB