≈ $3,200
- GPU compute (FP32) 24.7 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 18,531 vs 9,764
- Video memory 32 GB vs 10 GB
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
Alternatives to Alienware m17 R5 Ryzen Edition RX 6700M (2022)
10 desktop replacements at a similar price that compete with the m17 R5 Ryzen Edition RX 6700M (2022) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the m17 R5 Ryzen Edition RX 6700M (2022)
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.2 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 135 W
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 2,304
- Video memory 6 GB vs 10 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,813 vs 9,764
- GPU compute (FP32) 22.2 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 5,632 vs 2,304
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 135 W
- Video memory 8 GB vs 10 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 25.4 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,304
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 135 W
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 135 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 13 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,538 vs 9,764
≈ $2,900
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,942 vs 9,764
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 14,909 vs 10,145
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $4,100
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,961 vs 9,764
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,304
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $6,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,387 vs 9,764
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 20,224 vs 10,145
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Refresh rate 360 Hz vs 165 Hz
- RAM (up to) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- GPU shader cores 5,632 vs 2,304
- Video memory 8 GB vs 10 GB
- Advanced Optimus
- GPU compute (FP32) 25.4 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 360 Hz vs 165 Hz
- RAM (up to) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Advanced Optimus
- USB-C ports 2 vs 3