≈ $6,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 12,190
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
Alternatives to Alienware m16 RTX 4060 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the m16 RTX 4060 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the m16 RTX 4060 (2023)
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 86 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,072
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Refresh rate 360 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 9,728 vs 3,072
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,350 vs 12,190
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Refresh rate 360 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 27.2 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 17,955 vs 12,190
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Refresh rate 360 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 20.7 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 86 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 130 W vs 115 W
- GPU shader cores 5,632 vs 3,072
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 480 Hz
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $5,000
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,424 vs 12,190
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 480 Hz
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 86 Wh
- Weight 2.28 kg vs 3 kg
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Refresh rate 360 Hz vs 480 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 86 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Refresh rate 360 Hz vs 480 Hz
≈ $2,050
- GPU compute (FP32) 20 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,900 vs 12,190
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,072