≈ $2,450
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- GPU shader cores 3,072 vs 1,536
- CPU cores 8 vs 4
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Alternatives to Alienware m15 R3 GTX 1660 Ti (2020)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the m15 R3 GTX 1660 Ti (2020) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the m15 R3 GTX 1660 Ti (2020)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 6,013 vs 5,601
- GPU shader cores 1,920 vs 1,536
- GPU compute (FP32) 4.5 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.6 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,300 vs 5,601
- GPU shader cores 2,304 vs 1,536
≈ $1,150
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 4
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 3,928 vs 5,601
- Video memory 4 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.4 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,030 vs 4,715
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,536
- Battery capacity 59 Wh vs 86 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 16.7 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,030 vs 4,715
- GPU shader cores 6,144 vs 1,536
- Battery capacity 59 Wh vs 86 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 12 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,030 vs 4,715
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- Battery capacity 59 Wh vs 86 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.5 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,709 vs 4,715
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,536
- Battery capacity 71 Wh vs 86 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,709 vs 4,715
- Battery capacity 71 Wh vs 86 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB