7% cheaper ≈ $1,500
- Battery capacity 63 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Response time 3 ms vs 25 ms
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,662 vs 9,376
- GPU power (TGP) 85 W vs 95 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.2 TFLOPS vs 13.1 TFLOPS
- pan.tf
- Gaming laptops
- Alienware 15 RTX 5050 (2026)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Alienware 15 RTX 5050 (2026)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the 15 RTX 5050 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the 15 RTX 5050 (2026)
8% cheaper ≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 13.1 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,978 vs 9,376
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Weight 2.42 kg vs 2.25 kg
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
10% cheaper ≈ $1,500
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 54 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 95 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.9 TFLOPS vs 13.1 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.42 kg vs 2.25 kg
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
15% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 95 W
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 10
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
8% cheaper ≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 13.1 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 16,096 vs 9,376
- Weight 2.48 kg vs 2.25 kg
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
18% pricier ≈ $1,950
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 95 W
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 54 Wh
- CPU cores 8 vs 10
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
14% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Battery capacity 57 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.25 kg
- Video memory 6 GB vs 8 GB
- Max. supported RAM 16 GB vs 32 GB
32% pricier ≈ $2,150
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 10
19% cheaper ≈ $1,350
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 54 Wh
- RAM (up to) 24 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 95 W
- Weight 2.48 kg vs 2.25 kg
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
18% pricier ≈ $1,950
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 180 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 2.25 kg
- Thickness 25 mm vs 23 mm