- GPU compute (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 1.9 kg vs 1.7 kg
Alternatives to Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GTX 1660 Ti (2021)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Predator Triton 300 SE GTX 1660 Ti (2021) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Predator Triton 300 SE GTX 1660 Ti (2021)
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.5 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 95 W vs 75 W
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 1.9 kg vs 1.7 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.4 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,536
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 691 vs 276
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- MUX switch
- GPU compute (FP32) 16.7 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,818 vs 5,223
- GPU shader cores 6,144 vs 1,536
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- MUX switch
≈ $2,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.7 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Video memory 16 GB vs 4 GB
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 8.2 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,536
- Video memory 6 GB vs 4 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.7 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,114 vs 5,223
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 713 vs 276
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 60 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 8.7 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.42 kg vs 1.7 kg
- SSD (base) 256 GB vs 1,024 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 691 vs 276
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- MUX switch
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.9 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,548 vs 5,223
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,536
- Weight 2.27 kg vs 1.7 kg
- SSD (base) 256 GB vs 1,024 GB