≈ $4,400
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 18,437 vs 10,701
- GPU compute (FP32) 25.9 TFLOPS vs 15.3 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 110 W vs 90 W
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Advanced Optimus
Alternatives to Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)
≈ $3,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 24.2 TFLOPS vs 15.3 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 90 W
- MUX switch
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.6 kg
≈ $4,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 31 TFLOPS vs 15.3 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,359 vs 10,701
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,328
- MUX switch
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.6 kg
≈ $2,900
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.1 TFLOPS vs 15.3 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,446 vs 10,701
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $3,100
- CPU cores 20 vs 8
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,774 vs 620
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 18,468 vs 11,013
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 1.99 kg vs 1.6 kg
≈ $3,200
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 15.3 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 17,182 vs 10,701
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 90 W
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Advanced Optimus
≈ $3,200
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 15.3 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 90 W
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,499 vs 11,013
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Advanced Optimus
≈ $3,900
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 24.2 TFLOPS vs 15.3 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
≈ $2,150
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 1 ms
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,328
- Battery capacity 71 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thickness 18 mm vs 17.3 mm
≈ $2,350
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 1 ms
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Battery capacity 71 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thickness 18 mm vs 17.3 mm