5% cheaper ≈ $2,150
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
Alternatives to Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4070 (2024)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4070 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $2,250
8.2
Alternatives to the Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4070 (2024)
10% cheaper ≈ $2,050
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 125 W
7% pricier ≈ $2,450
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.3 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 1.9 kg
6% pricier ≈ $2,400
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 19,324 vs 12,880
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 125 W
15% pricier ≈ $2,600
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,623 vs 12,880
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 2.52 kg vs 1.9 kg
4% pricier ≈ $2,350
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 76 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 1.9 kg
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 4,608
16% pricier ≈ $2,600
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 2.52 kg vs 1.9 kg
14% pricier ≈ $2,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.4 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 125 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,096 vs 12,880
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 2.68 kg vs 1.9 kg
9% cheaper ≈ $2,050
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 125 W
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
15% cheaper ≈ $1,900
- Video memory 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 1.9 kg