≈ $5,000
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 24.7 TFLOPS
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Advanced Optimus
Alternatives to Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4080 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4080 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4080 (2023)
≈ $6,800
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 24.7 TFLOPS
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 754 vs 1,378
- GPU power (TGP) 150 W vs 165 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 24.7 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.7 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 24.7 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.7 kg
≈ $4,200
- SSD (up to) 16,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- SSD (base) 16,000 GB vs 512 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 165 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,241 vs 18,309
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 24.7 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 11,300 vs 14,967
≈ $9,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 24.7 TFLOPS
- Video memory 32 GB vs 12 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Advanced Optimus
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 24.7 TFLOPS
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Advanced Optimus
- USB-A ports 2 vs 3
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 24.7 TFLOPS
- Advanced Optimus
- USB-A ports 2 vs 3
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 24.7 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 165 W
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.7 kg