Same price ≈ $1,600
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.4 kg
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,328
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 180 Hz
Alternatives to Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)
Same price ≈ $1,600
- Weight 2.25 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Thickness 23 mm vs 25 mm
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
8% pricier ≈ $1,750
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,328
- Thickness 24 mm vs 25 mm
- Webcam 1,080p vs 720p
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 76 Wh
7% cheaper ≈ $1,500
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 76 Wh
4% cheaper ≈ $1,550
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Weight 2.25 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Thickness 23 mm vs 25 mm
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
13% pricier ≈ $1,850
- Weight 2 kg vs 2.4 kg
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 3,328
- Thickness 23 mm vs 25 mm
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
18% pricier ≈ $1,900
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Webcam 1,440p vs 720p
- Thickness 23 mm vs 25 mm
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 180 Hz
22% cheaper ≈ $1,250
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 76 Wh
25% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.4 kg
- Bluetooth 5.4 vs 5.2
- Battery capacity 63 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
27% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Thickness 24 mm vs 25 mm
- Webcam 1,080p vs 720p
- Bluetooth 5.4 vs 5.2
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 76 Wh