≈ $1,950
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,079 vs 5,145
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 6.7 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 70 W
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Alternatives to Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 3050 (2024)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 3050 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 3050 (2024)
≈ $1,550
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 70 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 11.7 TFLOPS vs 6.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,119 vs 5,145
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $2,700
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 70 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 6.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,206 vs 5,145
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $2,050
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,048
- Panel type IPS vs TN
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 2.5 kg
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 53 Wh vs 57 Wh
≈ $1,650
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.6 TFLOPS vs 6.7 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 120 W vs 70 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,467 vs 5,145
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,050
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 57 Wh
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- CPU cores 6 vs 10
≈ $1,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 6.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,396 vs 5,145
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 70 W
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $1,350
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 6.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,730 vs 5,145
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 70 W
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 6.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,862 vs 5,145
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 70 W
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Panel type IPS vs TN
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.6 TFLOPS vs 6.7 TFLOPS
- Weight 1.77 kg vs 2.5 kg
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4