≈ $1,200
- SSD (up to) 5,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- RAM (up to) 48 GB vs 32 GB
- Panel type IPS vs TN
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.7 TFLOPS vs 20.1 TFLOPS
Alternatives to Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2025)
≈ $1,500
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,400
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Panel type IPS vs TN
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 13,288 vs 9,352
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,850
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs TN
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 180 Hz
≈ $1,500
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type IPS vs TN
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- MUX switch
≈ $2,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type IPS vs TN
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $2,150
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Video memory 12 GB vs 8 GB
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,400
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type IPS vs TN
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.4 kg
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $1,400
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- Panel type IPS vs TN
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 20.1 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $2,350
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 85 W
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 2.52 kg vs 2.4 kg