≈ $2,150
- Video memory 32 GB vs 6 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,080 vs 7,518
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 75 W
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Alternatives to Acer Nitro V 15 Intel ANV15-51 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro V 15 Intel ANV15-51 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro V 15 Intel ANV15-51 RTX 4050 (2023)
≈ $3,700
- GPU power (TGP) 145 W vs 75 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 10.5 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 57 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,250
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 75 W
- MUX switch
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,783 vs 7,518
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $2,000
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,463 vs 7,518
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 75 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 10.5 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $1,950
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 75 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,079 vs 7,518
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $4,200
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 75 W
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 57 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 10.5 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.1 kg
- Pixel density 130 ppi vs 141 ppi
≈ $2,050
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- RAM (base) 32 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (base) 2,000 GB vs 512 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 53 Wh vs 57 Wh
≈ $5,600
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 57 Wh
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- Resolution class 4K (2160p/2400p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.1 kg
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 57 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 95 W vs 75 W
- MUX switch
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,230 vs 7,518
- GPU compute (FP32) 7.9 TFLOPS vs 10.5 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 57 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 95 W vs 75 W
- MUX switch
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 4,962 vs 7,518
- Thunderbolt or USB4