Same price ≈ $1,600
- GPU power (TGP) 100 W vs 60 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.6 TFLOPS vs 9.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,791 vs 7,733
- Weight 2.43 kg vs 1.6 kg
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Alternatives to Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 5050 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 5050 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 5050 (2025)
14% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 15 TFLOPS vs 9.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,059 vs 7,733
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Battery capacity 55 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
7% pricier ≈ $1,750
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 9.9 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 60 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,947 vs 7,733
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 1.6 kg
- Advanced Optimus
6% pricier ≈ $1,700
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Screen size 15.6″ vs 14″
- Battery capacity 58 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
14% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 20.1 TFLOPS vs 9.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,588 vs 7,733
- GPU power (TGP) 85 W vs 60 W
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 1.6 kg
Same price ≈ $1,600
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Webcam 1,440p vs 1,080p
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Weight 2.1 kg vs 1.6 kg
Same price ≈ $1,650
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 1.6 kg
- Thunderbolt or USB4
11% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- GPU power (TGP) 80 W vs 60 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 14 TFLOPS vs 9.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,698 vs 7,733
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Same price ≈ $1,600
- GPU power (TGP) 95 W vs 60 W
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.1 TFLOPS vs 9.9 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 76 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
10% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,427 vs 7,733
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.7 TFLOPS vs 9.9 TFLOPS