≈ $2,100
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,887 vs 6,170
- CPU cores 14 vs 6
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Alternatives to Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)
≈ $2,250
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,712 vs 6,170
- CPU cores 14 vs 6
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,792 vs 6,170
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 57 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,850
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,047 vs 6,170
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 57 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 1.74 kg
≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,308 vs 6,170
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 57 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- MUX switch
≈ $2,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 2,560
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 57 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $2,150
- GPU shader cores 5,888 vs 2,560
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 57 Wh
- Video memory 12 GB vs 6 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,862 vs 6,170
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Weight 2.9 kg vs 1.74 kg
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,650
- CPU cores 16 vs 6
- Battery capacity 75 Wh vs 57 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 1.74 kg
≈ $1,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 15 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,059 vs 6,170
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 2,048 GB