≈ $1,950
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,079 vs 2,478
- CPU cores 24 vs 6
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
Alternatives to Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)
≈ $1,650
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.6 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,467 vs 2,478
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 57 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $2,700
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,206 vs 2,478
- Video memory 32 GB vs 4 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 1.7 kg
≈ $2,050
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,048
- Video memory 8 GB vs 4 GB
- CPU cores 10 vs 6
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 53 Wh vs 57 Wh
≈ $1,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,396 vs 2,478
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,048
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $1,050
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.9 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,799 vs 2,478
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.27 kg vs 1.7 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 20 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,831 vs 2,478
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,048
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,427 vs 11,031
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,512 vs 2,478
- Video memory 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,427 vs 11,031
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.6 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,263 vs 2,478
- Video memory 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.38 kg vs 1.7 kg
≈ $2,250
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,712 vs 2,478
- CPU cores 14 vs 6
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4