- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,870 vs 3,715
- GPU compute (FP32) 4.9 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Video memory 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 51 Wh vs 58 Wh
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 5 AN517-54 GTX 1650 (2021)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 5 AN517-54 GTX 1650 (2021) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 5 AN517-54 GTX 1650 (2021)
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,847 vs 3,715
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 51 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 7.6 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,333 vs 3,715
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.1 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,048 vs 1,024
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 4,562 vs 3,715
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,048 vs 1,024
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 15 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,564 vs 3,715
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,024
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- MUX switch
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 4.6 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.4 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,357 vs 3,715
- GPU shader cores 5,632 vs 1,024
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.6 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,098 vs 3,715
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 8.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 6,369 vs 3,715
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh