- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU shader cores 2,048 vs 1,024
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,940 vs 7,144
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41 GTX 1650 (2021)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 5 AN517-41 GTX 1650 (2021) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 5 AN517-41 GTX 1650 (2021)
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.5 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,819 vs 3,644
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,940 vs 7,144
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 58 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 2.7 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 3,319 vs 3,644
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,940 vs 7,144
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 58 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 4.6 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,940 vs 7,144
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 12 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,729 vs 3,644
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,940 vs 7,144
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 17.5 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,522 vs 3,644
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,024
- Weight 2.79 kg vs 2.7 kg
- Thickness 26.9 mm vs 24.9 mm
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,979 vs 3,644
- Video memory 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Weight 2.79 kg vs 2.7 kg
- Thickness 26.9 mm vs 24.9 mm
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,234 vs 3,644
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Weight 2.79 kg vs 2.7 kg
- Thickness 26.9 mm vs 24.9 mm
≈ $2,800
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 58 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Brightness 250 nits vs 300 nits
- Screen size 15.6″ vs 17.3″
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,420 vs 3,644
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 58 Wh
- Upgradable RAM
- SSD (base) 256 GB vs 512 GB