- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,982 vs 4,710
- GPU shader cores 2,048 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- Response time 19 ms vs 3 ms
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 5 AN515-55 GTX 1650 (2021)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 5 AN515-55 GTX 1650 (2021) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 5 AN515-55 GTX 1650 (2021)
- GPU compute (FP32) 8.2 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,999 vs 3,366
- Battery capacity 49 Wh vs 58 Wh
- Response time 29 ms vs 3 ms
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 7,317 vs 4,710
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,101 vs 3,366
- Battery capacity 49 Wh vs 58 Wh
- Response time 29 ms vs 3 ms
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 6,982 vs 4,710
- MUX switch
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 65 W vs 75 W
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.7 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,847 vs 3,366
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 51 Wh vs 58 Wh
- Pixel density 127 ppi vs 141 ppi
- GPU compute (FP32) 7.6 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 2,560 vs 1,024
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,333 vs 3,366
- GPU power (TGP) 60 W vs 75 W
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.1 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 7,200 vs 4,710
- GPU shader cores 2,048 vs 1,024
- GPU power (TGP) 60 W vs 75 W
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 12 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,100 vs 3,366
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Weight 2.46 kg vs 2.27 kg
- Response time 7 ms vs 3 ms
- GPU compute (FP32) 12 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,723 vs 3,366
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,024
- Weight 2.46 kg vs 2.27 kg
- RAM speed 2,933 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.4 TFLOPS vs 3.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,357 vs 3,366
- GPU shader cores 5,632 vs 1,024
- Battery capacity 54 Wh vs 58 Wh
- Response time 9 ms vs 3 ms