≈ $4,200
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,241 vs 8,972
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,878 vs 12,420
- Advanced Optimus
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 4050 (2023)
≈ $1,600
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,820 vs 8,972
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 10,408 vs 12,420
≈ $2,150
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,260 vs 8,972
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- Weight 3.1 kg vs 3 kg
≈ $6,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 8,972
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,560
- Advanced Optimus
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E
≈ $1,750
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,292 vs 8,972
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,149 vs 8,972
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 18,694 vs 12,420
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Advanced Optimus
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,677 vs 8,972
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Response time 28 ms vs 7 ms
≈ $3,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,934 vs 8,972
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,878 vs 12,420
- Advanced Optimus
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 3 kg
- Thickness 21.8 mm vs 28.9 mm
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,878 vs 12,420
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,107 vs 8,972