≈ $4,200
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,241 vs 5,605
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 95 W
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,878 vs 12,420
- Advanced Optimus
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023)
≈ $1,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,820 vs 5,605
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 95 W
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 10,408 vs 12,420
≈ $1,750
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 95 W
- SSD (up to) 6,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.4 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 48 GB vs 64 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
≈ $1,000
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- SSD (up to) 6,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,799 vs 5,605
- CPU cores 6 vs 14
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $4,000
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,048
- Video memory 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Resolution class 4K (2160p/2400p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 144 Hz
≈ $1,750
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,292 vs 5,605
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 95 W
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,716 vs 5,605
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,048
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,885 vs 5,605
- GPU compute (FP32) 11.7 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,957 vs 5,605
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $3,000
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,048
- Video memory 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E
- Thickness 30 mm vs 28.9 mm