≈ $4,200
- CPU cores 12 vs 6
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,241 vs 21,510
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 4080 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 4080 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 4080 (2023)
≈ $2,150
- CPU cores 16 vs 6
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,260 vs 21,510
≈ $6,600
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 15,617 vs 8,770
- CPU cores 14 vs 6
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Advanced Optimus
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 18,694 vs 8,770
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,504 vs 638
- CPU cores 12 vs 6
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,149 vs 21,510
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,902 vs 8,770
- CPU cores 24 vs 6
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,024 vs 638
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,219 vs 21,510
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,902 vs 8,770
- CPU cores 24 vs 6
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,024 vs 638
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,547 vs 21,510
- CPU cores 12 vs 6
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 150 W vs 140 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,498 vs 21,510
- Advanced Optimus
≈ $3,000
- CPU cores 24 vs 6
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E
- Thickness 30 mm vs 28.9 mm
- CPU cores 12 vs 6
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,878 vs 8,770
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,934 vs 21,510
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS
- CPU cores 16 vs 6
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 14,577 vs 8,770
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,321 vs 638
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,776 vs 21,510
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS