≈ $1,600
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Advanced Optimus
- Max. supported RAM 32 GB vs 64 GB
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 4050 (2023)
≈ $1,750
- SSD (up to) 6,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 3.1 kg
- RAM (base) 48 GB vs 16 GB
- RAM (up to) 48 GB vs 64 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,129 vs 9,456
≈ $4,200
- SSD (up to) 16,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- Advanced Optimus
≈ $6,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 9,456
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,560
- Advanced Optimus
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E
≈ $1,400
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- CPU cores 10 vs 6
- Weight 3 kg vs 3.1 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,911 vs 9,456
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 18,694 vs 8,770
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,504 vs 638
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Advanced Optimus
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 12,873 vs 8,770
- CPU cores 10 vs 6
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Response time 28 ms vs 7 ms
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 12,873 vs 8,770
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,677 vs 9,456
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Response time 28 ms vs 7 ms
≈ $3,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- CPU cores 12 vs 6
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Advanced Optimus
- Liquid metal (CPU)