≈ $1,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,820 vs 5,777
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 95 W
- Advanced Optimus
- Max. supported RAM 32 GB vs 64 GB
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 3050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 3050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 3050 (2023)
≈ $1,750
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 95 W
- SSD (up to) 6,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.4 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 48 GB vs 64 GB
- Advanced Optimus
≈ $1,050
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.9 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU power (TGP) 90 W vs 95 W
≈ $4,200
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,241 vs 5,777
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 95 W
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- Advanced Optimus
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,885 vs 5,777
- GPU compute (FP32) 11.7 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,716 vs 5,777
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.2 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,048
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,957 vs 5,777
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,400
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 95 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.4 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,911 vs 5,777
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
≈ $6,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 5,777
- GPU power (TGP) 150 W vs 95 W
- Advanced Optimus
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E
- GPU compute (FP32) 11.4 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,248 vs 5,777
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 3.1 kg
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh