≈ $2,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 6 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- CPU cores 10 vs 6
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
Alternatives to Acer Nitro 17 AMD AN17-42 RTX 4050 (2024)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Nitro 17 AMD AN17-42 RTX 4050 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Nitro 17 AMD AN17-42 RTX 4050 (2024)
- CPU cores 24 vs 6
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,923 vs 799
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 19,702 vs 12,272
- Advanced Optimus
- SD card reader
- CPU cores 24 vs 6
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,129 vs 799
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Advanced Optimus
- CPU cores 24 vs 6
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 2,129 vs 799
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Advanced Optimus
- CPU cores 16 vs 6
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Advanced Optimus
- SD card reader
≈ $1,350
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,627 vs 9,060
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 140 W
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- CPU cores 14 vs 6
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Advanced Optimus
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
- CPU cores 14 vs 6
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,337 vs 9,060
- Advanced Optimus
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 3.1 kg
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 3.1 kg
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 90 Wh