pan.tf
Compare
Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026)

Razer Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026)

What Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (7) and where Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026) wins (18) — every spec side by side.

Razer · 2025Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025)

9.0Score

7 advantages

Razer · 2026Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026)

9.7Score

18 advantages≈ $5,600

Higher score

7.4Graphics9.8

8.4Overall performance9.7

8.3Display9.8

8.8Memory & storage8.4

8.0Battery & portability6.8

8.6Features & cooling8.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025)Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026)

	Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025)	Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026)	Difference
Depth	224.3 mm	251 mm	−26.7 mm
Width	310.7 mm	355 mm	−44.3 mm
Thickness	16.2 mm	17 mm	−0.8 mm
Weight	1.6 kg	2.1 kg	−0.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026)?

Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Weight1.63 kg vs 2.14 kg+31%
Thickness16.2 mm vs 17 mm+5%
SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 4,000 GB+2%
Pixel density243 ppi vs 189 ppi+29%
CPU threads20 vs 16+25%
Geekbench 6 single-core2,990 vs 2,822+6%

Why is Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026) better than Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025)?

GPU compute (FP32)18.4 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS2.8×
3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,102 vs 26,6952.2×
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 175 W+52%
Video memory8 GB vs 24 GB3×
GPU shader cores3,328 vs 10,4963.2×
Brightness450 nits vs 1,100 nits2.4×
Battery capacity72 Wh vs 90 Wh+25%
Geekbench 6 multi-core13,980 vs 16,854+21%
CPU cores10 vs 16+60%
Response time1 ms vs 0.2 ms5×
SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 4,000 GB3.9×

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Razer Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025)9.0	Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2026)≈ $5,6009.7
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop	GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	115 W	175 W
Video memory	8 GB	24 GB
Video memory type	GDDR7	GDDR7
GPU shader cores	3,328	10,496
GPU compute (FP32)	18.4 TFLOPS	51.4 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	12,102	26,695
Processor
Processor	Ryzen AI 9 365	Core Ultra 9 386H
CPU maker	AMD	Intel
CPU cores	10	16
CPU threads	20	16
Max CPU clock	5 GHz	4.9 GHz
Processor options	Ryzen AI 9 365	Core Ultra 7 365, Core Ultra 9 386H
Geekbench 6 multi-core	13,980	16,854
Geekbench 6 single-core	2,990	2,822
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	1,072	1,231
Display
Screen size	14″	16″
Resolution	2880 × 1800	2560 × 1600
Resolution class	3K (1800p/2000p)	QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate	120 Hz	240 Hz
Panel type	OLED	OLED
Brightness	450 nits	1,100 nits
sRGB coverage	100%	100%
Response time	1 ms	0.2 ms
DCI-P3 coverage	100%	100%
Pixel density	243 ppi	189 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
G-Sync / FreeSync	Yes	Yes
Advanced Optimus	Yes	Yes
MUX switch	Yes	Yes
HDR	Yes	Yes
Touchscreen	No	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	64 GB	64 GB
RAM (base)	16 GB	32 GB
RAM type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
RAM speed	8,000 MHz	9,600 MHz
Upgradable RAM	No	No
SSD (up to)	4,096 GB	4,000 GB
SSD (base)	1,024 GB	4,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots	2	2
SSD interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 5.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	72 Wh	90 Wh
Power adapter	200 W	280 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	Yes	Yes
USB-C charging power	100 W	100 W
Design & cooling
Weight	1.63 kg	2.14 kg
Thickness	16.2 mm	17 mm
Width	310.7 mm	355 mm
Depth	224.3 mm	251 mm
Body material	Aluminium	Aluminium
Colours	Black, Gray	Black
Cooling fans	2	2
Vapor chamber cooling	Yes	Yes
Liquid metal (CPU)	No	No
Fan noise (max. load)	54.6 dB	53.7 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	USB4	Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	Yes
USB-C ports	2	2
USB-A ports	2	3
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	No	No
Ethernet port	No	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	6
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	Yes	Yes
Numeric keypad	No	No
Key travel	—	1.5 mm
Webcam	1,080p	1,080p
IR camera (face login)	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint reader	No	No
Audio
Speakers	4.2	6 speakers
Dolby Atmos	No	No