vs
6.2Display9.8
3.3Memory & storage4.3
5.7Battery & portability6.0
8.6Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
| Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023) | Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 284 mm | 260 mm | +24 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm | = |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 28 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.6 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023) better than Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Resolution class4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 300 Hz2.5×
- Video memory8 GB vs 24 GB3×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 10,4962.3×
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 10,496 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13950HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 24 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 4K (2160p/2400p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 100 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.65 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 284 mm | 260 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
MSI Raider GE68 HX 14V RTX 4090 (2024)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)9.26.3
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7600S (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)6.26.3
vsLenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)6.36.3
vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)6.46.3
vsAcer Nitro 17 AN17-41 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)6.26.3
vsDell G16 7630 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)6.26.3